2. Mensa practice test. Mensa is the world's largest and oldest high-IQ society, and only those who score in the 98th percentile or higher are accepted. The Mensa practice test asks questions that are aligned with the skills commonly tested by IQ assessments and provides an equivalent score that corresponds to a person’s IQ range. Although answering the mini test will not show an accurate IQ score, it can give a rough indicator of how well you may do if you attempted a Mensa IQ Test. Advertisement. I just did the "Psychology Today" IQ Test, and I scored a 133. I've done an IQ test from the Mensa website as well, and I scored about 10 points lower. I'm thinking that the reason for the discrepancy is the fact that visual-spatial reasoning is my weakest area, while verbal reasoning is my strongest (and the Mensa test was "culturally fair"). I took the Mensa Sweden test today, I scored 116 at my first try, but couldn't complete all the questions in time, took it again and I scored 126. I'm curious on whether the test is accurate enough to me give me a ball park estimate of my IQ? The real Mensa IQ test is really two tests: a timed test with 50 questions and one with seven sections. (Scoring in the 98th percentile on either test qualifies you to join.) 4. nenoatwork. • 2 yr. ago. These tests are to indicate whether or not you have the potential to join Mensa. Maybe there is some fine print I'm missing, but look at it. Here is Norway's. I'm not sure about the Danish one, but maybe it says something different. I could be wrong, but these tests appear very accurate in that they are correctly Here are the answers and stats for arealme.com IQ Test. IQ Test Answers and Stats Last updated: Jun 24, 2022 IQ Chart | Celebrity IQ | IQ by country | Answers & Stats. I took the online Mensa Norway test last night right before I went to sleep and got a meager estimation of 100IQ. I do believe my actual IQ is closer to 100 than 135; However, since Mensa Norway only tested pattern recognition coupled with the fact that I was exhausted, I'm left to deduce that both results were inaccurate and therefore not aqiIU.